Pecaturjogja’s Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

THE ULTIMATE BLUNDER

Posted by pecaturjogja pada Juli 8, 2011

Anyone can hang a piece, but a good blunder requires thought. There is one sort of move that is almost always played after calm, if not happy contemplation: resigning. Sometimes it is wrong to resign – or to agree to a draw. Recently in Dos Hermanas, Svidler took a draw against Anand when he had a forced win. Kasparov made both blunders within a few months in 1997, first resigning a game against Deep Blue that he could have drawn, then taking a draw against Lautier in a position that he could have won.
But those are blunders that only cost half a point – the ultimate blunder is when a player resigns in a winning position. It happens more often than you might think; in my ramblings through chess literature I have come across 35 examples. Click here to go to the first, and then click the diagrams to go to the next one.

 

1
 
Black to play
Von Popiel – Marco 
Monte Carlo 1902 This is the earliest, the most famous, and still the clearest example of this blunder. Black resigned because he saw he was going to lose the Bd4. He could have won on the spot with 36…Bg1

2

Black to play 

Krejcik – Schwarz 
Vienna 1905, city championship Seeing the fork 1…Kd5 2.Ne7+ Black resigned, but after 2…Ke4 3.Nxc8 f3+ 4.Kf2 (otherwise a counterfork) Bh4+ 5.Kg1 f2+ 6.Kh2 f1Q he would have won; his king will escape the checks and he will mate White soon.

3

White to play
Torre – NN 
New York 1924, simul 

The Mexican grandmaster did not see what he could do against Rc1+ and promotion, and resigned. With 1.Rd6! he could have saved the day, and even have won: e.g. 1…Rxd6 2.g8Q+ Kd7 (Rd8 3.Qxd8+ and 4.f7) 3.Qf7+ Kc6 4.Qe8+ Kb6 5.Qe3 Kc6 6.Qxc5+


4

Black to play
 
Ahues – NN 
Berlin 1920 In this ‘free’ game, White had just sacrificed his Queen on f6 and Black resigned – what can he do against mate? 1…Qe1+ 2.Kh2 Qxc3 3.Qxc3 isn’t much fun. But with 1…Qg4 (sadistically, he could first play Qd1+), he could have remained a Rook to the good.

5

Black to play
 
Meyrinck – Eilinger 
1936 Black played the nice combination 1…Ne3+ 2.fxe3 Rb2 and White resigned because the promotion cannot be stopped. That was true, but he missed an equally nice countertrick: 3.Rf2 c2 4.Ba3 c1Q 5.Rxb2 and the back rank mate costs Black his new queen.

PS 28 April 2005: As Kirill Kryukov shows, 4…c1Q is not forced. With 4…Rxa2! Black can still draw, e.g. 5.Bc1 a5 6.Kf3 a4 7.Rd2 h5 8.Ke2 a3 9.Kd3 Ra1 10.Rxc2 a2 11.Bd2 hxg4 12.Kc3 Rh1 13.Rxa2 Rxh2 etc. I’ll have to remove this case from the collection.

6

White to play

NN – Sonnenschein 
Berlin 1937 White resigned because he was losing his Queen, but he could have mated in a few moves: 1.Bxf7+ Kxf7 2.Rf1+ Kg8 3.Rf8+ Rxf8 4.Qg7 mate

7

White to play

NN – Grammatikoff 
London 1938 Here, White resigned in view of 1.Rxd2 Rxd2 2.Qg4 h5 when he would end up a Rook down. He overlooked 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.Qg4, when there will be no h5.

8

Black to play

Goldstein – Turi 
Budapest 1942 

In this strange case, Black is the exchange and a pawn up, and after 1…Qe6, he must eventually win. However, he saw something even better: 1…Qxf2+ – and resigned immediately after playing it. One wonders what he could have thought, both in playing that move and in resigning. The move was very good: either he takes the white Queen with check and after that the Rb8, or there follows 2.Kh3 Rh6+ 3.Qxh6 gxh6 4.Rxe8+ Kg7 and Black wins. Did he overlook the flight square on g7 in that last variation?

9

White to play 

Keller – Schlemmer 
Women’s Ch. ‘Greater Germany’, Vienna 1943 

This was the final position of a decisive last round game; by winning it White would have tied for the championship. According to the story, Keller said: ‘It’s over.’
‘I prefer to play on a little,’ Schlemmer said.
‘No, I mean I’m resigning.’
White wins with 1.c6 (threat Kb8) Bd5 2.Kb6 Kd8 (if Bc4 then 3.c7) 3.Kxb5 Kc7 4.Kc5 Bxc6 (otherwise 5.b5) 5.g6 and wins.


10

White to play
Kofman – Sacchetti 
Bucarest 1948 White, a renowned problem composer who later emigrated to the Soviet Union resigned here, because he did not see what he could do against the mate threat Qxh3. He could have won a piece and the game by 1.Re8+ Kd7 2.Re3 Qg7 (or Qf4 or Qh4) 3.Rxd4+ (Qxd4 4.Rd3 Qxd3 5.Ne5+)

11

Black to play

Romi – Staldi 
Italy, Championship 1954 Black was so shocked by the Queen sacrifice on h7 that he resigned immediately. But after 1…Kxh7 2.f8Q+ Kg6 3.Rg7+ (3.Qxc8 Rf1+ and mate) there follows Kh6 (a difficult move to see ahead, but he could have let the situation arise) and Black remains a rook up.

12

Black to play

Wolk – Oswald 
1954 White had just plyed Re5-f5 and Black resigned because of 1…Qh4 2.g3 Qh3 3.Qxg7+ and Qxd4+ However, 1…Re4 would have turned the tables: because 2.Rxe4 Qa1+ (note the double clearance of the diagonal) is mate, the mating threat Rxe1 means Black can simply take the Rf5 next move, and will remain a rook up.

13

Black to play

Negyesi – Honfi 
Budapest 1955 A case of mutual blindness, based on the overburdening of the Nc3. It has to guard against Rd1+ and Qxa2+. But 19…Rd1+ 20.Nxd1 Qxa2+ 21.Kc1 and Black has nothing. Therefore: 19…Qxa2+ The other way round! White resigned in view of 20.Nxa2 Rd1 mate. Both overlooked the fact that the deflected knight has a new defense: 21.Nc1

14

Black to play 

Rudenko – Rootare 
USSR 1956 In her winning position (but not 29…Rxd5 30.exd5 b2 31.d6), Black saw an immediate decision, and played 29…b2 White, the women’s World Champion 1950-1953, resigned because of 30.Bxa2 Rc1 and queens. Only later did both notice that after 31.Rf1, there is no queening, and Black would have had to resign.

15

White to play
Sanguineti – Najdorf 
Mar del Plata 1956 

White could have won simply with 58.Qg8+ Ke7 (Bf7 59.Qd8 and mate next move) 59.Qxg6 and now both Rxd4 and Rxg4 fail to 60.Qg7+ Ke8 61.Kd6 and mate next move. But he saw something even quicker: 58.Kd8 and indeed, Black resigned, not seeing anything against Qe7 mate—or that Rxg4 would give him a winning position. The logic is that with his last move, White didn’t only threaten Qe7 mate, but also interfered with his Queen’s access to c8, which he needed against Rxg4. Black also hadn’t noticed this.

16

White to play 

 

Mathot – Baumgartner 
cr France 1958 

White resigned in view of the Rooks’ power on the second rank. 1.Rc8 however, would have been a forced win. The threat is 2.Qxh6+ and Rh8 mate, and 1…h5 doesn’t help because of 2.Qg5 and the threat is renewed. Or 1…g5 2.fxg5 Qg6 3.Nxe6 and there is nothing against 4.Nf8+, winning the Queen. An interesting try is 1…Qg8!? because after 2.Rxg8 Kxg8 the black Rooks would still be killing. But after 2.Nf5 or even better 2.Nxe6 (Qxc8 3.Ng5+ Kg8 4.Qxh6) Black is still lost.

17

Black to play 

 

Ortega – Etcheverry
Havana, Pan American championship 1963

Black, who had been better all along, decided the game here with the nice double decoy 38…Nd2+ White resigned, because on 39.Nxd2, there follows Qg1 mate, and on 39.Bxd2, there follows Qf2 mate.
Only, in the last variation, Qf2 is an impossible move.

18

Black to play

Darga – Lengyel 
Amsterdam izt 1964 Black played 41…R6xe2+, and White resigned. Both players overlooked that after 42.Rxe2 Bxh4+, 43.Kg2 is not forced; 43.Ke3 is possible. Perhaps it was logical to miss that, e3 being so very inaccessible to the white King before (Ke3-f2 had been White’s last move.)

19

Black to play

Langeweg – Krabbé 
Zierikzee 1967, championship Netherlands Seeing nothing against Qxf7, Black resigned. Later, Kurt Richter showed in the Deutsche Schachzeitung that he could have drawn with 32…Rc2 33.Rf1 Rc1 etc. But over 30 years later, in his book ‘Der letzte Fehler’, Klaus Trautmann showed Black could even have even won: 32…Rc2 33.Rf1 and now Qd2! and 34.Rg2 Qxg2+ 35.Qxg2 Rxg2+ 36.Kxg2 Bxa4 and wins, or 34.Rh3 Bxa4 35.Kh1 Be8 36.Rg1 Re7 37.Qf6 Qg2+ 38.Rxg2 Rc1+ 39.Rg1 Rxg1+ 40.Kxg1 gxf6 ‘White will hardly find a way out’.

20

White to play

W. Schmidt – Kwasniewski 
Lublin 1969, ch Poland White played 41.Bxd4, whereupon Black, instead of remembering that important maxim ‘patzer sees an adjournment, patzer gives an adjournment,’ resigned. With 41…Qh3+ 42.Kg1 Rf1+ 43.Qxf1 Bxd4+ 44.Rf2 Qxg3+ 45.Bg2 Bb7 46.Kh1 Qxh4+ 47.Kg1 Qg3 48.Kh1 Bxg2+ 49.Qxg2 Qxf2 he had an entirely forced win.

21

Black to play

Havasi – Reko 
Budapest 1976 Black resigned, missing a deep, but entirely forced win with a well-known breakthrough: 1…c4 2.bxc4 (2.dxc4 a4, and now either 3.bxa4 b3 or 3.c5 axb3 as in the main line. Or 2.Kg3 c3 3.bxc3 a4 4.bxa4 dxc3 etc.) a4 3.c5 a3 4.bxa3 bxa3 5.c6 a2 6.c7 a1Q 7.c8Q Qf1+ 8.Kg3 Qf4+ 9.Kh3 Qf3+ 10.Kh2 Qf2+ 11.Kh3 Qh4+ 12.Kg2 Qxg4+ 13.Qxg4+ Kxg4 and wins.

22

Black to play

Zinn – Syre 
Dresden 1977 Mutual blindness again. Black, a Rook up but faced with a nasty mating threat, could have won immediately with 1…Qd1+ when White cannot stay off the white squares for long, allowing Black a winning check with his Bc8. But play continued: 1…Kf7? 2.Be8+ (the repetition with Qh7+ and Qh8+ was easier) Ke7 and here White still had a draw with 3.Bxg6 Qd1+ 4.Kc3 Qe1+ etc. After 3.Bc6?, Black resigned. He still had that win with Qd1+

23

White to play

Kotov – Lambert 
London 1978 

The game was adjourned in the position of the diagram. Lambert offered a draw, which was stupid enough, but when Kotov told him his sealed move was 42.Re6+ and the intended continuation 42…Kd7 43.Rxe8 Kxe8 44.Re6+ followed by Rxe4 and Rxg4, he even resigned. Kotov’s great authority may have helped him to miss that with 43…g3, instead of recapturing the Rook, he could have won – the adjourned position was a forced win for him.

24

Black to play
 

Dekhanov – K. Yusupov 
Uzbekistan Championship 1981 Black (not grandmaster Arthur) played 1…Qa6 and White resigned, thinking the possibility of Qf1 mate forced an exchange of Queens. He missed a very nice forced mate: 2.g4+ fxg4+ 3.Nxg4+ g5 (Qxb5 4.Nf6 mate) 4.Qe8+ Qg6 5.Nf6 mate

25

White to play

Veprek – Glaz 
Bad Kissingen 1982 After 33.Rxb7, Black resigned. She saw no defense; 33…Qxb7 34.exf5 and Bd5+ will decide. Her main reason was that after 34…Qh7 35.Bd5+ Kh8 36.Qxf8+ would be mate – missing that the Queen would have been pinned.

26

Black to play

Rijnsbergen – v.d.Weijden 
Haarlem 1983From a club match in Holland. White had just sacrificed his rook on g7, and Black resigned because of 1…Kxg7 2.Qxf6+ Kg8 3.Nh6+ when he must give the Queen. That wouldn’t have mattered however: 3…Qxh6 4.Qxh6 Ne2+ 5.Kh1 Rxf1 mate. For the same reason, Black could play 2…Kh7; 3.Ng5+ Qxg5! etc.
27

Black to play
 
Jonasson – Angantysson 
Iceland 1984 What Black invented here went around the world as a brilliancy: 26…e2 (Bxf6 would have won easily) 27.fxe7 Bd4+ and White resigned. Very nice. Months later, a reader of the Observer chess column, which was one of the many where this combination was published, asked what happens if White plays 28.Ne3.

28

Black to play

Samarin – Antoshin 
Berdyansk 1985 This too was published as a nice combination by Black – in the Latvian SAHS this time. With 35…Qxh2+ 36.Kxh2 Rcg8, he threatened an unstoppable mate. White agreed, and resigned. With two clever moves however, as reader E. Veveris from Riga demonstrated, 37.e6 and 38.Rxc5, he could have remained a rook ahead.

29

Black to play
Martorelli – Antunes 
Reggio Emilia II 1985/86 Black, seeing no defense to White’s threats, resigned. For instance: 39…Rxd7 40.Rxd7 and wins. Or 39…Rf7 40.Rxe7 Rxd1+ 41.Kg2 Rxe7 42.Qf8 mate. But with 39…Qf7! Black could have stopped White’s attack. After 40.R1d5 (only move) Qg8 42.Rxc7 Rf7 Black should win.

30

Black to play

Sznapik – Van Gils 
Liege 1986 Blindness of a special kind; forgetting the rules. Black didn’t see how he could avoid losing a Bishop without being mated by Qxg6+, and resigned. The Polish master then pointed out 20…O-O to him (‘and Black is better’), a possibility that had not occurred to Van Gils. ‘Black is better’ was a euphemism, to use a euphemism. After 21.Bxg7 Kxg7 Black, with his royal extra pawn and White’s weaknesses on b4 and e6, is winning. Van Gils suggested to me that White’s title’s authority might have contributed to his blunder.

31

White to play
 

Matamoros – Klinger 
Gausdal Junior World Championship 1986A special case. In great time trouble White touched his Knight, saw he could have won by simply Rxg6, panicked about losing his Rg7 now, and resigned. With 36.Nh5+ however, he could have reached the same position and still have taken the Knight: 36…Ke8 37.Nf6+ Kf8 or Kd8 and now 38.Rxg6 winning a piece and with a winning attack.

32

White to play

Both – Späte 
Women’s Championship Germany, Bad Lauterberg 1987 A parallel to Keller – Schlemmer (diagram 7). This too, was a decisive last round of a German Women’s Championship and here too, White resigned in a won position. In view of g7+, 40.Kc1 would have been enough. Had White won she, and not Späte, would have been champion.

33

White to play 

Hartmann – Rädisch 
Correspondence, 1987 In this position, again from a correspondence game, White resigned as the passed pawns cannot be stopped. He didn’t see that they do not need to be stopped: 1.Re2! c2 2.Kd4 and Re6 mate. Even 1.Ra1 wins (b2 2.Re1 Kc5 3.Kd3)

34

White to play 

Nagler – Wolkenstein 
Eberswalde 1995 Total blindness. After 1.Bd4? (Qxa1!) Black resigned, missing the not too difficult 1…Nc2+ and Black remains a rook up.

35

White to play
 

Glek – Lazarev 
Porto San Giorgio 1997 Black had been pestered with a threat on f8 for a long time, and believed to have finally succumbed to it when White played 43.Rxf8+ He resigned, but after Kxf8 44.Bc5+ Re7 45.Bxe7+ Ke8, 46.Qxe4 would be forced, and Black shouldn’t have too much trouble winning, e.g. 46…dxe4 47.Bg5 a5 48.Bxf4 Kd7 49.Be5 g6 50.Kg1 Ke6 51.Bg7 Kd5 52.Kf2 Kc4 53.Ke3 b4 54.Kxe4 a4 55.Ke3 Kb3 56.Kd2 Ka2 and a pawn promotes.

I’m a bit surprised that there are only two example from after 1987. Isn’t this blunder en vogue anymore? Did I forget to collect? Any help?

3 Tanggapan to “THE ULTIMATE BLUNDER”

  1. 087884339203@@@ said

    yang aq tanya problem catur bukan

  2. julio said

    Malam,saya cuman mau menawarkan software catur..ada 3 jenis pilihan yang bisa anda beli..

    1.8 in 1 software catur (Chessmaster,Houdini 2,Rybka 3,FRITZ 12 PORTABLE version,dll seharga 50.000 => http://www.kaskus.us/showthread.php?t=10777768

    2.software FRITZ 12 full version dengan database seharga 25.000 => http://www.kaskus.us/showthread.php?t=11733608

    3.software MEGADATABASE 4 juta PARTAI seharga 25.000 => http://www.kaskus.us/showthread.php?t=11733500

    Untuk info lebih lanjut hubungi
    JULIO
    082124284125
    PIN BB : 32821C86

  3. julio said

    Selamat siang,saya mau menawarkan software catur..ada 6 jenis pilihan yang bisa anda beli..

    1.8 in 1 software catur (Houdini 2,kasparov chessmate,Rybka 3,FRITZ 12 PORTABLE version,dll) seharga 50.000

    2.software Deep Fritz 13 harga 25.000 ( software yang mempunyai sistem analisis yang baik)

    3.software Chessbase 11 harga 25.000 (database partai berjumlah 2 juta lebih yang telah diklasifikasi)

    4.software Chessmaster 10 harga 25.000 (punya metode training dan course paling bagus)

    5.kumpulan ebook catur sebanyak 500 ebook harga 25.000

    6.Kumpulan chess video lesson 25.000

    untuk info lebih lanjut cek website
    http://livebeta.kaskus.us/post/000000000000000676168281#post000000000000000676168281

    Hubungi
    JULIO
    082124284125
    PIN BB : 32821C86

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout / Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Google+

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Logout / Ubah )

Connecting to %s

 
%d blogger menyukai ini: